The petitioner failed to attend hearing on repeated summonses despite cautioning, demonstrating loss of interest. The criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37111 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-
======================================================
Rupesh Kumar Mukhiya @ Rupesh Mukhiya S/o Rajendra Mukhiya @ Kare Mukhiya, R/o Village- Sorkahi, P.S.- Shahiganj, P.S.- Dhamdaha, DistrictPurnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner despite
repeated calls. However, Ld. A.P.P. for the State is present.
the last date, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner to attend the matter and the petitioner was cautioned to attend the matter on the next date of hearing. Despite such cautioning, the petitioner is not present to attend the matter, which shows that the petitioner has lost interest to pursue the present case.
(Jitendra Kumar, J.)
ravishankar/-
U T
Rupesh Kumar Mukhiya
The State of Bihar
Soni Devi
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
