Gopal Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal miscellaneous application was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner claimed the case became infructuous alleging acquittal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3372 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2020 Thana- PUNPUN District- Patna
====================================================== GOPAL KUMAR Son of Vinay Prasad R/v- Olidad, P.S.- Mehendiya, District- Arwal
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate Ms.Priyanka Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that
this case has become infructuous as, according to him, the petitioner has already been acquitted in this case.
2. Be that as it may, as prayed, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
arvind/-
U T
Gopal Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court