Allowed

Deo Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jul 2023CR. MISC./33594/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition for bail under sections 302 and 363 IPC, the court granted bail to the petitioners despite the submission of the charge sheet, relying on their clean antecedents and the implausibility of the prosecution case given the delay in lodging the FIR.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount.

Deo Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33594 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-535 Year-2022 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DEO MAHTO,

¶5

Prem Mahto, Both sons of Vilat Mahto R/O Village- Sahpur Khurd, P.S- Goraul (Kathara O.P), Distt.- Vaishali.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kalyan Shankar

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 12-07-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to add paras in bail petition during course of the day.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Goraul (Kathara O.P.) P.S. Case No. 535/2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363/120(B)/ 34, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per prosecution case, petitioners and others alleged to have assaulted the informant’s husband by administering him toddy and other intoxicated items and since then the informant’s husband was found traceless. The informant has suspicion that petitioners alongwith other accused persons concertedly committed the murder of her husband.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33594 of 2023(2) dt.12-07-2023 2/3

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 16.12.2022 and bear no criminal antecedent. He further submits that from perusal of the FIR, it appears that there is no eye witness of the occurrence. Except suspicion there is nothing on record to demonstrate the complicity of the present petitioners with the alleged occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from their possession of the petitioners. He further submits that prudently and pragmatically there are no possibility when marriage party came to the house of the petitioners, they will think to commit such crime. During course of investigation, the I.O. could not collect any legal evidence against the petitioners. He further submits that there is inordinate delay of three days in lodging FIR without giving any satisfactory explanation which makes the prosecution case doubtful and unreliable. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

¶20

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, charge sheet has already been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33594 of 2023(2) dt.12-07-2023 3/3

¶23

evidence and keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioners, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Goraul (Kathara O.P.) P.S. Case No. 535/2022, subject to following conditions:-

¶24

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶25

(ii) Petitioners will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶26

(iii) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶27

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶28

amitkumar/-

¶29

U T

Deo Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deo Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Bajrang Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Iktashab Alam @ Shahanshah Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Mahto @ Ajay Kumar Mahto Vs the State of Bihar