Oral order disposing of a quashing application. The court allowed the petitioner liberty to withdraw the current petition to file an application under Section 210 of Cr.P.C., staying the complaint case but allowing the FIR to continue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3276 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2020 Thana- NAUTAN District- Siwan
====================================================== INDRADEV PANDIT @ JAWAHIR PANDIT @ INARDEV PANDIT Son of
Banwari Pandit R/v- Hasua, P.S.- Nautan, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 03-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3276 of 2023(2) dt.03-08-2023 2/2
application is disposed of.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T
Indradev Pandit @ Jawahir Pandit @ Inardeev Pandit
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
