Allowed

Ritesh Kumar @ Siya Saran Yadav @ Siya Sharan v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Dec 2023CR. MISC./32529/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a restoration application to reinstate a dismissed criminal revision petition. The petition, filed for restoration under the specific number, was restored to its original file after hearing counsels for both the petitioner and the state.

What did the court decide?

The application for restoration of Cr. Rev. No. 296 of 2018 is allowed and the matter is restored to its original file.

Ritesh Kumar @ Siya Saran Yadav @ Siya Sharan Vs the… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32529 of 2023

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL REVISION No.296 of 2018

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Madhepura

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Ritesh Kumar @ Siya Saran Yadav @ Siya Sharan, aged about 38 years, Male, S/O Natho Yadav, R/O Village- Chikni Fulkaha, P.O- Fulkaha, P.SGamhariya, Distt.- Madhepura.

¶7

... ... Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar.

¶10

Bibha Devi @ Bibha Kumari, W/O Ritesh Kumar @ Siya Saran Yadav @ Siya Sharan, D/O Triveni Prasad Yadav, at present resident of VillageLaxminiya, P.S- Gamhariya, Distt.- Madhepura.

¶11

... ... Opposite Parties

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Shaheen Begum, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 02-12-2023 This matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders (on office notes)’.

¶15

From perusal of the office notes dated 30.11.2023, it appears that the notices were issued upon the opposite party no. 2 under both process and the ordinary notice has been received by the brother of the opposite party no. 2 but jointness has not been filed. It has further been pointed out by the office that undelivered registered cover also received with report of the postal peon that “addressee not meet, so returned”.

¶16

Considering the same, service of notice upon the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32529 of 2023(4) dt.02-12-2023 2/2

¶18

opposite party no. 2 deemed to be validly served.

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶20

A.P.P. for the State.

¶21

The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of Cr. Rev. No. 296 of 2018 which was dismissed on 05.11.2019 for non-prosecution.

¶22

Considering the submissions as advanced on behalf of the petitioner and the grounds as stated in the application, the present restoration application is allowed and Cr. Rev. No. 296 of 2018 is restored to its original file.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

U.K./- U T

Ritesh Kumar @ Siya Saran Yadav @ Siya Sharan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritesh Kumar @ Siya Saran Yadav @ Siya Sharan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pintu Singh @ Pintu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Nand Kishore Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Devendra Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Chaudhary @ Ashok Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Nawalesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar