Allowed

Danjel Marcus Jacob @ Denjel Morcus Jacob v. the Central Bureau of Investigatin (Cbi) through Its Superintendent of Police

Patna HC19 Jul 2023CR. MISC./31998/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Rajiv Roy, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31998 of 2023, granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing allegations of misappropriation. The relief was conditioned on furnishing a bond with sureties and surrendering the passport, considering the petitioner's deposit of the defalcated amount similar to another accused.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, and by satisfying specif

Danjel Marcus Jacob @ Denjel Morcus Jacob Vs the Central Bureau of… — Corruption | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31998 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2021 Thana- C.B.I CASE District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Danjel Marcus Jacob @ Denjel Morcus Jacob Son Of Marcus Jacob Resident Of Grain Shop Para ,NEAR Santoshi Mandir, Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Central Bureau Of Investigation (CBI) through Its Superintendent Of Police Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the C.B.I. : Mr.Avanish Kumar Singh, S.P.P. Mr. Ambar Narayan, Advocate Mrs. Barkha, Advocate ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 19-07-2023

¶9

Heard Mr. Shailendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Avanish Kumar Singh duly assisted by Mrs. Barkha, learned counsels for the C.B.I.

¶10

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Special Case No. 03 of 2021-R.C. No. 02(A)/2021 instituted under Sections 120B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A of the Indian Penal Code and section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(a) of P.C. Act.

¶11

As incorporated in the order dated 12.7.2022, two anticipatory bail applications relating to same P.S. were taken together and while the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner (Cr. Misc. No. 27907 of 2022) was rejected on 1.2.2023, the anticipatory bail to one Kumari Punam who was also an accused was allowed on the ground that she deposited

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31998 of 2023(3) dt.19-07-2023 2/3

¶13

the allegedly defalcated amount of Rs.5,64,907/-.

¶14

Now the present anticipatory bail was repeated by the

¶15

petitioner stating that the allegation against him is of misappropriation of Rs. 14, 93,540/- which he has deposited under protest to the GPO, Patna and a certificate to this effect has been issued by the concerned office on 13.7.2023 (which form Annexure-6 to the second supplementary affidavit). Although this being second anticipatory bail, this Court at first instance was not inclined to grant him relief, taking into account the aforesaid fact that in case of Kumari Punam as she made payment and was granted relief, this Court deems it appropriate to extend the same relief to the petitioner herein on the ground that he has made the payment of alleged misappropriated amount to the tune of Rs. 14, 93,540/-.

¶16

Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, C.B.I.-II, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 03 of 2021, R.C. Case No. 02(A)/2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with the following further conditions.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31998 of 2023(3) dt.19-07-2023 3/3

¶18

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;

¶19

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶20

(iii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

¶21

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶22

(v) the petitioner shall surrender the passport, if any, at the time of execution of bail bonds.

¶23

The Cr. Misc. No. 31998 of 2023 stands allowed with the aforesaid observation.

¶24

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶25

Ravi/-

¶26

U T

Danjel Marcus Jacob @ Denjel Morcus Jacob v. the Central Bureau of Investigatin (Cbi) through Its Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Danjel Marcus Jacob @ Denjel Morcus Jacob v. the Central Bureau of Investigatin (Cbi) through Its Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Baran Singh Vs The Union of India and Ors.

Mamta Prasad Vs The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Randhir Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Nath @ Bhola Nath Gupta Vs The Biharsharif Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Deo Kumar Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan Sahani Vs The State of Bihar