Disposed

Bhola Khan @ Bhola v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jan 2023CR. MISC./31882/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners apprehended arrest in a 2006 Narpatganj murder case; police had submitted final form against them and no evidence emerged during investigation. The court directed their release on bail upon arrest or surrender on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Pre-arrest/anticipatory bail: release on arrest or surrender within four weeks on Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties, subject to s.438(2) CrPC conditions.

Bhola Khan @ Bhola Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 31882 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2006 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BHOLA KHAN @ BHOLA SON OF LATE SAKUR R/O VILLAGEGOKHALAPUR, P.S.- NARPATGANJ, DISTRICT- ARARIA

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 47472 of 2022

¶11

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2006 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria

¶12

======================================================

¶13

TULSI PASWAN S/O LATE BALDEO PASWAN Resident of villageKashmaul, P.S.- Nargama, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶18

======================================================

¶19

with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 51695 of 2022

¶20

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2006 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria

¶21

======================================================

¶22

KISHANDEV MANDAL @ KISHUNDEV RAUT Son of Late Shakun Mandal Resident of Village - Mirdaul, P.S.- Narpatganj, District - Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶27

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 31882 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nafisuzzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 47472 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 51695 of 2022)

¶28

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 31882 of 2022(3) dt.12-01-2023 2/3

¶29

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶30

ORAL ORDER

¶31

3 12-01-2023

¶32

The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

¶33

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶34

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 329 of 2006, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 328 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶35

As per allegation, the informant firstly lodged complaint petition for the occurrence of murder of informant’s son Ekbal with allegation that the petitioners and other accused persons had committed the murder of the son of the informant.

¶36

The learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that they are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. During the investigation, no evidence emerged against the petitioners and they were not sent up for trial by the investigating authority. Differing from the opinion of investigating authority, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance. He has submitted further that the informant is the father of the deceased. He has also submitted that co-accused Abdul Barik is facing trial in Sessions Trial No. 172 of 2016. The deposition of the informant

¶37

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 31882 of 2022(3) dt.12-01-2023 3/3

¶38

Md. Mustafa was recorded in that Sessions Trial and he did not support the prosecution case. He has stated that he did not know as to who killed Md. Ekbal.

¶39

On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly conceded that police have submitted final form against the petitioners.

¶40

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-II Class, Araria in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 329 of 2006, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶41

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶42

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶43

Nirmal/Kundan U T

Bhola Khan @ Bhola v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhola Khan @ Bhola v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Hasan Ekwal @ Md. Hasan Equebal Vs the State of Bihar

Deo Kumar Soni Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nandjee Sharma @ Nand Thakur @ Nandu Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar