Allowed

Ganesh Yadav @ Manjhala Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC15 May 2023CR. MISC./3073/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a PS. Case involving multiple offences under the IPC. Bail was ordered subject to the furnishing of a bond and two sureties, with conditions regarding criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount each subject to conditions.

Ganesh Yadav @ Manjhala Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3073 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-402 Year-2021 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ganesh Yadav @ Manjhala Yadav S/O Dhuri Yadav Resident of VillagePandit Bigha, P.S.- Khizarsarai, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 15-05-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner in the present case is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case no. 402 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 307, 337, 338, 353, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. He has got one criminal antecedent.

¶14

As per the prosecution story, when the informant along with the police personnel raided the house of the petitioner for arrest in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case No. 359 of 2021, the petitioner and his family members started abusing and pelting stones as a result of which the informant sustained injury on his left palm.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3073 of 2023(2) dt.15-05-2023 2/3

¶17

case. It is submitted that there are general and omnibus kind of allegations and there is no material against the petitioner to connect him with the present case.

¶18

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Having regard to the submission that in the First Information Report there are general and omnibus kind of allegations against the named and 8-10 unknown persons, the alleged occurrence has taken place during night hours, as against the petitioner there is no material to connect him with the present case save and except that he was an accused in a case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in connection with which the police party had gone to the house of the petitioner on the date of occurrence, the nature of the allegations and there being no specific overt act alleged against the petitioner, this Court directs release of the petitioner above named on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Khizarsarai P.S Case No. 402 of 2021, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3073 of 2023(2) dt.15-05-2023 3/3

¶21

And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶22

This application stands allowed.

¶23

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶24

SUSHMA2/-

¶25

U T

Ganesh Yadav @ Manjhala Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Yadav @ Manjhala Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Barun Jay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeshwar Prasad and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Jha @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The Punjab National Bank

Sujeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Priya Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Aryan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar