Manoj Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29895 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2022 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran
======================================================
Manoj Kumar, S/o Singhasan Mahato Resident of Village- Manorpur, P.S.Amnaur, District- Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anjani Parashar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
5 16-03-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 366, 504, 506/34, 366 (A) and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and 4/6 of POCSO Act.
According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that the accused petitioner kidnapped her twenty years old married daughter for marrying with her.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated against the petitioner and he has falsely been implicated in the case due to some ulterior motive.
Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29895 of 2022(5) dt.16-03-2023 2/2
that it appears from the medical report of the victim that after kidnapping the victim girl by the petitioner, she became pregnant. Further submits that the meedical report also reveals that the petitioner has committed wrong with the victim.
Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Amnaur P.S. Case No. 38/2022 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO Act), Saran at Chapra
Prayer is refused.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
kamlesh/-
U T
Manoj Kumar
State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court