Allowed

Ram Tahal Das v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Apr 2023CR. MISC./2900/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving assaults, unlawful assembly, and threatening behaviour. The court considered the petitioner's custody, lack of criminal antecedents, and general nature of allegations.

What did the court decide?

Relief to release the petitioner on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Ram Tahal Das Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2900 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-423 Year-2022 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Tahal Das S/O Late Kailu Das R/v- Sujal Korama, P.S.- Rajoun, DistrictBanka

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhirendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 03-04-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 307, 325, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per prosecution case, petitioner along with coaccused persons threatened and assaulted the informant due to which he sustained injury.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmity and land dispute. The FIR lodged after four days delay of alleged occurrence without giving any explanation. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather general and omnibus

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2900 of 2023(2) dt.03-04-2023 2/2

¶17

allegation leveled against him and no one has stated that who have assaulted the informant. He has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.09.2022.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as judicial custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 423 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka.

¶20

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶21

Manish/-

¶22

U T

Ram Tahal Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Tahal Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumitra Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Dineshwar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Paswan @ Habla @ Hadda Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Mahto @ Brajesh Vs The State of Bihar

Vikki Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Bikki Kumar @ Vikki Kumar Vs the State of Bihar