Allowed

Md. Taufik Alam @ Md. Taufique Alam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Mar 2023CR. MISC./2832/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted the petitioner provisional anticipatory bail for eight months in connection with a case involving Sections 406, 409, and 420 IPC, conditioned on furnishing a bond and two sureties, subject to the petriont surrendering or being arrested within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Provisional anticipatory bail for eight months grante dow furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Md. Taufik Alam @ Md. Taufique Alam Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2832 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-419 Year-2022 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. TAUFIK ALAM @ MD. TAUFIQUE ALAM SON OF ABBAS SAMSI @ MD. ABBAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MADHOPUR DIGHARUA, P.S.- TAJPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Zainul Abedin ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 17-03-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No.419 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Allegation against the petitioner is that he took 860 quintals of paddy from 22 farmers and misappropriated Rs.16,89,900/-, which is the price of paddy at the rate of Rs.1965/per quintals.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already deposited Rs.6,00,000/- in Co-

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2832 of 2023(2) dt.17-03-2023 2/2

¶15

operative Bank, Samastipur on 09.09.2022 and he is ready to deposit the rest amount, i.e., Rs.10,89,900/- also.

¶16

Considering the submissions that petitioner has already deposited Rs.6,00,000/- in Co-operative Bank, Samastipur on 09.09.2022 and he is also ready to deposit the rest amount, i.e., Rs.10,89,900/-, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on provisional anticipatory bail for eight months, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Samastipur in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No.419 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶17

The learned court below shall confirm the provisional anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner by this Court after verifying the fact that the petitioner has already deposited the entire amount.

¶18

This anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶19

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶20

S.KUMAR/-

¶21

U T

Md. Taufik Alam @ Md. Taufique Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Taufik Alam @ Md. Taufique Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Das Vs The State of Bihar

Bhintar Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Shashi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Nandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dukhan Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar