Allowed

Sunil Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC9 May 2023CR. MISC./2830/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hearing a petition for anticipatory bail filed by Sunil Kumar and Suman Saurav in a case involving alleged forgery and cheating. The Court ordered enlargement on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, subject to furnishing a bond and two sureties as per Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be enlarged on bail on arrest or surrender within six weeks by furnishing bond of Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties.

Sunil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2830 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2022 Thana- BIND District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sunil Kumar S/O Late Ram Lakhan Prasad Resident Of Village- Shivpuri Ramchandrapur, P.S.- Laheri, District- Nalanda.

¶5

Suman Saurav S/O Sunil Kumar Resident Of Village- Shivpuri Ramchandrapur, P.S.- Laheri, District- Nalanda.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

Versus ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

6 09-05-2023

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per FIR, petitioners have made forgery with the informant and got the Gas Agency and amount transferred in their favour.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that the husband of the informant has died on 01.05.2021 due to which she feeling not well and

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2830 of 2023(6) dt.09-05-2023 2/2

¶20

herself handed over the Gas Agency and all concerned articles to the petitioners for smooth running the said agency. He further submits that petitioners have criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

¶21

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

¶22

bail.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bind P.S. Case No. 120 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶25

devendra/-

¶26

U T

Sunil Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Balak Mahto @ Subalak Mahto @ Subalak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Banty Singh @ Sethji @ Banty @ Banty Tyagi Vs The State of Bihar

Gajendra Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Prasad Singhania Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Kumari Vs The State of Bihar through the S.P Vigilance, Bihar Patna