Allowed

Mujammil v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 May 2023CR. MISC./2811/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail matter arising out of PS Case No. 360 of 2022 under Section 392 IPC, the High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner subject to furnishing a bond and sureties, with conditions regarding antecedents and cooperation in trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each; bail bond to be verified by the court below.

Mujammil Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2811 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-360 Year-2022 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUJAMMIL Son of Anwar R/V- Kalchhina P.S- Bhojpur Dist- Ghaziabad

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashhar Mustafa, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 19-05-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 360 of 2022 dated 21.09.2022 registered for the offence under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The petitioner is alleged to have been apprehended by the police having illegal possession of eight cartoons of looted clinic plus shampoo.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R., however, the petitioner has been apprehended in this case on a secret input during course of investigation and on the basis of recovery of 8 cartoons of looted articles, as alleged in the F.I.R, from the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2811 of 2023(4) dt.19-05-2023 2/3

¶17

possession of the petitioner and thereafter the police has recorded confession of the petitioner. He further submits that as a matter of fact, the petitioner has not committed the crime in question rather his vehicle was used in the alleged occurrence on the point of gun by the other accused persons. He further submits that the co-accused, Dharesh Singh @ Daresh Singh and Ranji Chaudhar @ Ranjit Kumar Choudhary, have already been granted bail by different co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide order dated 01.05.2023 and 23.03.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15229 of 2023 and Cr. Misc. No. 73434 of 2022, respectively. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 21.09.2022.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Birpur, Supaul in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 360 of 2022 with the following conditions:-

¶20

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2811 of 2023(4) dt.19-05-2023 3/3

¶22

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

¶23

witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶25

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶26

brajesh/-

¶27

U T

Mujammil v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mujammil v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meena Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra @ Yogi Vs The State of Bihar

Perwez Alam @ Md. Perwez Vs The State of Bihar

Meena Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Dhan Bihari Ojha Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Sah Vs The State of Bihar