Allowed

Navlesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Aug 2023CR. MISC./2751/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail granted to petitioner in a case alleging assault, torture, and ouster from matrimonial home under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, conditioned upon furnishing a bail bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Navlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2751 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2020 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada

¶3

====================================================== NAVLESH KUMAR Son of Lalo Yadav R/v- Madho Bigha, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus

¶4

1. The State of Bihar.

¶5

RINKU KUMARI Wife of Navlesh Kumar R/v- Madho Bigha, P.S.Muffasil, District- Nalanda , at present r/v- Pathra English, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada

¶6

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Shankar Kumar For the State : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 21-08-2023

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

The petitioner in association of other co-accused is said to have assaulted, tortured and ousted her from the matrimonial home on non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶12

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that opposite party no.2 never visited the house of the petitioner and there was no relationship of husband and wife between them. It is further submitted that earlier to the

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2751 of 2023(3) dt.21-08-2023 2/2

¶14

case under hand informant/opposite party no.2 has lodged a complaint case before the learned C.J.M., Nawada, bearing Complaint Case No.1366/2019, against the petitioner and his family members in which cognizance had been taken on 05.03.2020. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

¶15

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer

¶16

for bail.

¶17

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Nawada Muffasil P.S. Case No.20 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

Navlesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navlesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishwajit Pandey Vs The state of Bihar through C.B.I.

Rani Kumari Vs the State of Bihar through C.B.I.

Shahabuddin Anwar @ Dablu Vs the State of Bihar

Anuj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Fuleshwar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar