Allowed

Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 May 2023CR. MISC./27315/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar disposed of a bail application filed by Vikash Singh in a criminal case involving FIR sections. The court was inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of similar amount.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27315 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2022 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIKASH SINGH @ VIKASH KUMAR SINGH S/o- RAMESH SINGH @ RAMESH KUMAR SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SOHAGRA PURAB PATTI PS-GUTHANI, DIST- SIWAN

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhakar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 24-05-2023

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 325, 307, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of firing upon the informant, due to which he sustained injuries.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to old dispute. He has committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner of rather specific

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27315 of 2023(2) dt.24-05-2023 2/2

¶18

allegation of firing is against co-accused Robin Singh and Roshan Singh, due to which the informant sustained gun-shot injuries. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He further submitted that, as per injury report two bullets injuries were found on the face and abdomen of the informant but the nature of the injuries have not been mentioned. He is languishing in judicial custody since 07.01.2023.

¶19

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for

¶20

the State.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No. 276 of 2022.

¶22

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶23

arish/-

¶24

U T

Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tarun Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vashishth Yadav @ Bashishth Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sk. Mantu Vs The State of Bihar