In this oral order, the High Court declined to quash a complaint case after the revisional court found no infirmity in the judgment dismissing the matter, noting no merit for intervention.
Quashing application not entertained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25260 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3422 Year-2011 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna
====================================================== Smt. Urmila Devi Sah
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 14-09-2023
learned APP for the State.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a quashing application challenging an order dismissing the complaint after the revisional court found no infirmity.
Smt. Urmila Devi Sah
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
