Allowed

Aman Kumar @ Rawan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Sept 2023CR. MISC./24883/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants regular bail to the petitioner, who was alleged to have demanded ransom and fired pistols during a coaching centre incident. The court released him on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties due to lack of physical injuries and prior similar bail for a co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Aman Kumar @ Rawan Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24883 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2022 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Aman Kumar @ Rawan Son Of Sujay Singh R/O Village- Malgodam, P.S.Nawada, District- Nawada

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Krishna Deo Raj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 01-09-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 385, 387 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

¶15

According to FIR, it is alleged that the petitioner along with co-accused demanded ransom to the owner of Amit Arts Coaching and also fired by their pistols.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics. It is further submitted that no one sustained gunshot injury in the alleged occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner which suggests the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24883 of 2023(3) dt.01-09-2023 2/2

¶18

complicity of the petitioner. The demand of ransom has also not been executed. Similarly situated other accused person has already been enlarged on bail by this Bench vide order dated 26.06.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.15834 of 2023. It is also submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.03.2022.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 83 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Nawada.

¶21

lata/- U T

¶22

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

Aman Kumar @ Rawan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman Kumar @ Rawan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjit Tanti @ Sanjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ritik Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Lal Babu Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Krishna Shukla Vs The State of Bihar