Allowed

Chinku Yadav @ Tinku Yadav @ Chintu Yadav@ Chiku Yadav@ Tiku v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 May 2023CR. MISC./22247/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court ordered the release of the accused petitioner on bail. The court found a lack of substantive material connecting the petitioner to the alleged murder and noted the release of a co-accused previously.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 20,000/- and two sureties with specific conditions.

Chinku Yadav @ Tinku Yadav @ Chintu Yadav@ Chiku… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22247 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-507 Year-2022 Thana- KAHALGAON District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chinku Yadav @ Tinku Yadav @ Chintu Yadav@ Chiku Yadav @ Tiku Son Of Upendra Yadav Resident Of Village- Lailakh, P.S.- Sabour, DistrictBhagalpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 19-05-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kahalgaon (Ghogha) P.S. Case No. 507 of 2022 registered on 04.06.2022 for the alleged offences under Sections 302 & 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per prosecution case, dead body of the father of the informant was recovered from a pond and there was presence of ante-mortem injuries on the body. The FIR was registered against unknown and later on, the name of the petitioner surfaced as one of the accused persons, who was involved in the murder of the father of the informant.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22247 of 2023(2) dt.19-05-2023 2/3

¶18

petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence and the dead body was recovered from an isolated place. The petitioner was apprehended merely on suspicion and his confessional statement was recorded by the police but the same has no legal sanctity. Learned counsel further submits that the name of the petitioner was firstly disclosed by co-accused Jaikant Yadav and the said co-accused has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 06.04.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 73206 of 2022. Learned counsel further submits that except suspicion there is nothing against the petitioner and police has failed to collect any material to show the complicity of this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 14.10.2022 and charge sheet has been submitted. The petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting that the name of the petitioner sprang up in the confessional statement of the co-accused and in his own statement recorded by the police in which he has confessed his guilt in killing the father of the informant.

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the lace of substantive material to connect the petitioner with the offence as alleged and grant of bail to co-accused by a Co-ordinate

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22247 of 2023(2) dt.19-05-2023 3/3

¶22

Bench and further considering the period of custody of the petitioner and submission of charge-sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur/concerned court in connection with Kahalgaon (Ghogha) P.S. Case No. 507 of 2022, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the following conditions :

¶23

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶24

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶25

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶26

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶27

DKS/-

¶28

U T

Chinku Yadav @ Tinku Yadav @ Chintu Yadav@ Chiku Yadav@ Tiku v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinku Yadav @ Tinku Yadav @ Chintu Yadav@ Chiku Yadav@ Tiku v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shubham Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Choudhary @ Nandan Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Faiyazul Haque Vs The State of Bihar

Jivachh Miyan @ Md. Jibrel Miyan @ Md.Jivrail @ Jivachh Miyan Vs The State of Bihar

Aakash Kumar @ Shivam Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar