Allowed

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Mar 2023CR. MISC./2156/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application by a petitioner apprehending arrest in Mahua P.S. Case No.79 of 2019 for offences under various IPC sections relating to an alleged assault on a school teacher. The court granted anticipatory bail subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2156 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2019 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ANIL KUMAR Son of Rajendra Ray R/V- Fatehpur Pakri, P.S- Mahua, DistVaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.Ii For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 24-03-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 333, 338, 353 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

¶14

All the accused persons are said to have assaulted the school teacher but any how the police escaped him.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that there is no material available on record in this case against the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2156 of 2023(2) dt.24-03-2023 2/2

¶17

petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has got one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

¶18

Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No.79 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶20

ajay/-

¶21

U T

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalam Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Chandeshwar Pd. Yadav @ Chandeshwar Prasad Yadav @ Chandra Shekhar Rai @ Chandeshwar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Raj Kumari Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Manjay Singh Vs The State of Bihar