Allowed

Ronak Kumar @ Tuntun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Apr 2023CR. MISC./2155/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted bail to the petitioner who apprehended arrest in a PS case involving abduction, kidnapping, and related offences, directing him to furnish a personal bond with the Chief Judicial Magistrate within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea within four weeks.

Ronak Kumar @ Tuntun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2155 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2022 Thana- JANKINAGAR District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RONAK KUMAR @ TUNTUN KUMAR S/O LAKSHMI NARAYAN YADAV Resident of village- Hatia Tola, Rupauli Ward No- 11, P.S.Jankinagar, District- Purnea.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Choudhary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha. APP Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Adv. ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 25-04-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

counsel for the State.

¶12

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Jankinagar P.S. Case No. 222 of 2022 registered for the offences under Sections 363, 366(A), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case. Further submission is that the daughter of the informant in her statement recorded under Section 164 stated that she had love affair with the petitioner since two years and was forced to marry one Devesh Kumar on dated 05.08.2022. She stated that on dated 11.08.2022 she fled away with the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2155 of 2023(2) dt.25-04-2023 2/2

¶15

petitioner on he own sweet will and wants to live with the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the petitioner, above named is directed to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing personal bond each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Jankinagar P.S. Case No. 222 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶17

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶18

anuradha/-

¶19

U T

Ronak Kumar @ Tuntun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ronak Kumar @ Tuntun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhuneshwar Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Vikash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjiv Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suruchi Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Basudeo Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Sabbo Praveen @ Jhanvi Sharma Vs The State of Bihar