Petitioner sought to withdraw a bail petition on the ground that he was arrested during its pendency, rendering it infructuous; the Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2116 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2019 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali
======================================================
RAHUL KUMAR @ RAHUL RAI Son of Narayan Rai @ Jai Narayan Prasad @ Pappu Rai Resident of Village- Bara Sumera, P.S.- Kudhani (Turki O.P.), District- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
| =================== | ... ... Opposite Party/s =================================== |
|---|---|
| Appearance : | |
| For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : =================== |
Mr.Arvind Kumar Sinha Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman =================================== |
| CORAM: HONOURABL PANDEY |
E MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR |
ORAL ORDER
2 18-01-2023
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of this bail petition, the petitioner has been arrested and, as such, it has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
In view of the aforesaid submission, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Mahesh/-
U T
Rahul Kumar
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar
Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
