Allowed

Nagendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jul 2023CR. MISC./1983/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a complaint case alleging criminal breach of trust regarding rent security money. The applicant was ordered to surrender within six weeks and furnish a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon surrender within six weeks by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties equivalent to the bail amount.

Nagendra Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1983 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-447 Year-2020 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NAGENDRA KUMAR YADAV Son of Shankar Lal Yadav Resident of Village- Agarpur, P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Kishor, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No.1, APP For the Complainant : Mr. Lalit Narayan Jha, Advocate ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 11-07-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant.

¶12

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.447 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The prosecution case, in brief, is that the complainant contacted the petitioner for taking his shop on rent and a Kirayanama was prepared on 25.07.2018. The complainant gave Rs.2,50,000/- as security money to the petitioner. It is further alleged that after taking the security money, the petitioner did not give possession of the shop to the complainant.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1983 of 2023(3) dt.11-07-2023 2/2

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that petitioner is ready to return Rs.2,50,000/- to the complainant. It is submitted that the complainant has filed Money Suit No.11/2019 in the learned court below.

¶16

Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the complainant opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶17

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No.447 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶19

S.KUMAR/-

¶20

U T

Nagendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Munir Ahmad @ Munir Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Das Vs The State of Bihar

Abdullah @ Shekh Abdullah Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Paswan @ Akhilesh Hajari Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Ram @ Jitendra Vs The State of Bihar

Vivekanand Thakur Vs The State of Bihar