This court granted the petitioner leave to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn. An additional direction was issued regarding the maintenance deposit.
Permission accorded to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn. O.P. No. 2 directed to deposit maintenance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19419 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1253 Year-2021 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar
======================================================
Akanksha Keshari @ Akanksha Kumari D/O Rajesh Keshari R/O Vill.- Sabda Pothia, P.S.- Falka, Distt.- Katihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
5 03-11-2023 Heard the parties.
After some arguments, learned counsel for
the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the
petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
The O.P. No. 2 is directed to timely deposit
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19419 of 2023(5) dt.03-11-2023 2/2
the maintenance amount as directed by the learned
Court below.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Shageer/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to withdraw the writ petition should be granted.
Akanksha Keshari
State of Bihar
Mithilesh Chandradeo
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
