Disposed

Sanni Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jun 2023CR. MISC./18625/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the 78-year-old petitioner, a principal accused, subject to surrender within four weeks and furnishing a bail bond with sureties, balancing grave allegations with advanced age and lack of specific assault charges.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner No.3 to be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Sanni Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18625 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-360 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanni Kumar Son Of Manoj Yadav Resident Of Village - Kankoul P.S. - Begusarai Muffasil, Distt. - Begusarai.

¶5

Karelal Yadav @ Nitish Yadav Son Of Bulbul Yadav Resident Of Village - Kankoul P.S. - Begusarai Muffasil, Distt. - Begusarai.

¶6

Ram Jee Yadav Son Of Buno Yadav Resident Of Village - Kankoul P.S. - Begusarai Muffasil, Distt. - Begusarai.

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prmod Manbansh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 12-06-2023

¶13

Heard Mr. Pramod Manbansh, learned counsel

¶14

appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the bail application, the petitioners No. 1 and 2 namely Sanni Kumar and Karelal Yadav @ Nitish Yadav have already been taken into custody and their prayer for pre-arrest bail has become infructuous.

¶16

In view of the above submissions, the pre-arrest bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioners No. 1 and 2 namely Sanni Kumar and Karelal Yadav @ Nitish Yadav is

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18625 of 2023(2) dt.12-06-2023 2/3

¶18

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶19

The petitioner no.3 namely Ram Jee Yadav apprehends his arrest in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 360 of 2022, registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶20

As per the allegation made in the F.I.R. the accused persons named in the F.I.R. including the petitioner No.3 armed with lethal weapons entered into the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and his uncle.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner no.3 submitted that the allegation against the petitioner no.3 is that he had given order to other co-accused to assault. No specific allegation of assault has been made against the petitioner no.3. The petitioner no.3 has clean antecedent and he is aged about 78 years and on these grounds he seeks to be released on bail.

¶22

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶23

Considering the nature of allegation made in the F.I.R. against the petitioner is that he was the order giver as well as the fact that petitioner is about about 78 years on the date of filing of the present bail application. Let the above named

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18625 of 2023(2) dt.12-06-2023 3/3

¶25

petitioner No.3 namely, Ram Jee Yadav, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 360 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶26

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶27

manish/-

¶28

U T

Sanni Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanni Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Rijwan @ Md. Rizwan Vs The State of Bihar

Shri Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through C.B.I.

Kanij Khola Fatima Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sikandra Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Chandradeo Bhuiyan Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Rai @ Mohan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar