Dismissed

Jamlul Mustafa @ Noori v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 May 2023CR. MISC./180/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged his arrest apprehension in a case involving IPC offences and POCSO. The court noted that a final charge sheet (final form) was submitted by the police. Consequently, the judge rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail and disposed of the application.

What did the court decide?

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected and the application is disposed of.

Jamlul Mustafa @ Noori Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.180 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2022 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jamlul Mustafa @ Noori S/O Late Md. Naseem R/V- Teermuhan, P.S.Saharghat, District- Madhubani

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Munna Ansari S/O Abdul Hamid R/V- Sanda (ISLAMIA Tola), P.S.Benipatti, District- Madhubani

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramesh Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 02-05-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Benipatti P.S. Case No. 221 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A), 376, 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions JudgeVIIth-cum-Special Judge (POCSO Court), Madhubani.

¶14

The petitioner is said to have abused the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner informs this

¶15

Court that the Police has submitted the final form against the petitioner and the same message has been given to him by the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.180 of 2023(3) dt.02-05-2023 2/2

¶17

brother of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

¶18

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the police has submitted the final form against the petitioner. Hence, this anticipatory bail is not maintainable.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of case as also the fact that the final form has been submitted against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶20

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of.

¶21

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶22

anand/-

¶23

U T

Jamlul Mustafa @ Noori v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jamlul Mustafa @ Noori v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Yadav @ Arun Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Lughani Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar @ Chotu Kumar @ Raju Kumar @ Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pravesh Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Bibi Sitara @ Sitara Bibi Vs The State of Bihar