Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in a Patna PS case. The court noted charges had been framed, signifying commencement of trial, and declined to interfere with the quashing application, rejecting it outright.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16438 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2018 Thana- MEHANDIGANJ District- Patna
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tilak Sao, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 25-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Since the charges have been framed which signifies commencement of the trial as such the Court is not inclined to interfere with the quashing application.
Accordingly, the present quashing application is rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
mdrashid/- U T
Dheeraj Kumar
Mala Pandit
Ruchi Kumari
The State of Bihar
Swati Soni
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
