Petitioners failed to appear despite repeated calls. The court held that petitioners were not interested in pursuing the application and dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16331 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2017 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna
======================================================
... ... Petitioners.
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bisheshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
3 02-02-2023 In spite of repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of
the petitioners.
On 19.01.2023 also none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
It appears that petitioners are not interested in pursuing this application.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
Trivedi/-
U T
Sidhi Singh @ Sidh Nath Singh and Anr and Dina Nath Singh
The State of Bihar, Sanjoy Kumar S/o Rambir Singh
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
