Oral order granting regular bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving theft and recovery of a stolen vehicle. Release ordered on furnishing a bail bond with two sureties.
Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15710 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2022 Thana- INDUSTRIAL AREA District- Vaishali
====================================================== Amit Kumar Son Of Surendra Rai R/O Village- Panapur Langa, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar In The District Of Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 28-04-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per FIR, prosecution case relates to recovery of stolen Bolero vehicle and the petitioner is alleged to be fled away from the place of occurrence who was involved in the selling the stolen vehicle.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor stolen vehicle was recovered from possession of this petitioner rather his name has been disclosed in this case by the co-accused namely, Vakil Kumar
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15710 of 2023(2) dt.28-04-2023 2/2
who was apprehended on spot. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery of vehicle in question or with coaccused and he has falsely been made accused in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.8.2022.
Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Hajipur Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 46 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Amandeep/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted regular bail in a case involving recovery of a stolen vehicle under Section 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
AMIT KUMAR
THE STATE OF BIHAR
SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
