This is a criminal miscellaneous application allowing the withdrawal of the petition. The court granted permission to withdraw the application and subsequently dismissed it as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15699 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2012 Thana- PAUTHU District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Both resident of village Saira, P.S. Pauthu, District Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Usha Kumari -1, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
learned A.P.P. for the State.
permission to withdraw this application.
withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Sangeeta Kumari W/o Ashok Kumar and Ashok Kumar S/o Durgadayal Mahto
The State of Bihar and Sanjay Kumar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
