Petitioners sought quashing of a cognizance order in an assault case, arguing they too were injured and a counter case existed. The court found a prima facie case and declined to interfere, disposing of the application with liberty to raise grounds at charge-framing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15124 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2017 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 08-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15124 of 2023(2) dt.08-08-2023 2/2
opposed they were assaulted by accused persons. It is also alleged that brother and nephew of the informant were also assaulted by petitioners and other co-accused.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Ranjeet/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cognizance order dated 07.07.2018 against the petitioners should be quashed on the ground that they also received injuries and there is a counter case.
5 provisions across 1 enactments
Raghuveer Mishra
Sanjit Kumar
Suman Kumari
The State of Bihar
Ranjeet Kumar Mishra
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
