Petitioner relied on an anticipatory bail order under Section 41A CrPC. Absent any current apprehension of arrest, the Court disposed of the application without granting further bail, implicitly upholding the existing benefit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15020 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2021 Thana- BASANHI District- Saharsa
======================================================
Ashok Bhagat S/O Late Ram Chandra Bhagat Resident of village- Mahua Bazar, Ward No.- 9, P.S.- Basanahi District- Saharsa (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anant Kumar 1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 24-05-2023 Petitioner has been granted benefit under Section
41A of the Cr. PC.. There is no apprehension of the petitioner’s
arrest at the moment.
The application is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
uttam/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 41A CrPC should be continued in light of the current lack of apprehension of arrest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Bhagat
The State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
