The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in connection with offences under Sections 323, 302, 304, 307 and 341 of the IPC, directing furnishment of bail bond and two sureties.
Enlargement of petitioner on bail by furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14747 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-366 Year-2020 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali
======================================================
SOURABH KUMAR @ KR. SOURABH S/o Suresh Narayan Singh R/o Kathariya, P.S.- Bidupur, Distt- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shyam Anand, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 10-05-2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 366 of 2020 dated 17.09.2020 registered for the offences punishable u/s 341, 323, 304, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, on information, the informant’s brother was found injured with cut injuries on his face at the poultry farm and he was moaning with pain.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14747 of 2023(2) dt.10-05-2023 2/2
petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of coaccused Anand Prakash. There is no eye witness to the occurrence alleged. The petitioner has got one more criminal case other than the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 26.8.2022.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the informant’s brother was badly injured by knife and during the course of treatment, the informant’s brother died.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Hajipur, Vaishali in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 366 of 2020.
The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
Ajay Singh/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in the present criminal case.
SOURABH KUMAR @ KR. SOURABH
The State of Bihar
CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
