Allowed

Abdul Malik Ansari @ Abdul Maliqu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jun 2023CR. MISC./14636/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this anticipatory bail petition, the Patna High Court granted bail subject to six weeks for surrender and furnishing bonds. The court directed the trial court to verify the genuineness of an alleged compromise with the informant before finalizing the bail acceptance, reserving the option to revoke bail if the compromise is disputed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail within six weeks upon surrender and furnishing bonds, subject to conditions precedent for acceptance of the bond.

Abdul Malik Ansari @ Abdul Maliqu Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14636 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2020 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ABDUL MALIK ANSARI @ ABDUL MALIQU Son of Late Anash Ansari R/V- Madhopur P.S- Chiraiya Dist- East champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Rina Sinha, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 19-06-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that earlier the petitioner had moved before this Court by filing Cr. Misc. No. 26196 of 2021 and the same was rejected by order dated 10.01.2022 by a learned Coordinate Bench. The learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that allegation against the petitioner is of order giver and thus had not assaulted, it is further submitted that on account of intervention of the well-wishers the informant has also entered

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14636 of 2023(3) dt.19-06-2023 2/3

¶15

into a compromise, it is further submitted no doubt case under Section 307 of the IPC is not compoundable but when the informant is not willing to pursue the case no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to jail when admittedly petitioner is not alleged to have assaulted the injured.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that no doubt Annexure-4 has been annexed with the Anticipatory bail application bringing on record the compromise entered in between the informant and the petitioner but then it is submitted whether the compromise is genuine or not.

¶17

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 307 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

However, the learned trial court before accepting the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14636 of 2023(3) dt.19-06-2023 3/3

¶20

bail bond of the petitioner shall issue notice to the informant to verify about the compromise entered in between the informant and the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that the compromise is genuine the bail bond shall be accepted and in the event, if the informant disputes the compromise then the present order shall not be given effect to.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

Adnan/-

¶23

U T

Abdul Malik Ansari @ Abdul Maliqu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Malik Ansari @ Abdul Maliqu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Arif Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mantu Malhotra @ Mantoo Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Arun Noniya Vs The State of Bihar

Kriti Kumari Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Farman @ Farman Vs The State of Bihar