Bail application in a Munger district criminal case; counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the application, which the court permitted, dismissing it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14131 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2022 Thana- DHARHARA District- Munger
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 27-04-2023
Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Parmanand Kumar, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/Nilmani/-
U T
Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Rai
Ankur Kumar @ Vimal Kumar Ankur
The State of Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
