Hearing a criminal miscellaneous application wherein the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition after surrendering, the single judge granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission was granted to withdraw the application; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13926 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2021 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria
====================================================== TUFANU MANDAL S/O RUPAN MANDAL R/v- Gopiya Toli, P.S.Kochadhaman, District- Kishanganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Khurshid Anwar, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
4 03-10-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
withdrawn.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
divyanshi/-
U T
Tufanu Mandal
Gopiya Toli
The State of Bihar
Sangita Devi
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
