Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application. The court dismissed the present application as withdrawn.
The Criminal Miscellaneous application is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13705 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-
======================================================
Bhola Mahto, Son of Late Ram Sundar Mahto, Resident of Village-Bashi, P.S.-Bhagwanpur (Teyai O.P.), District-Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 20-09-2023
Heard Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
nilmani/- U T
Bhola Mahto
The State Of Bihar
Munni Devi @ Sangita Kumari
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
