Anticipatory bail petition arising from a Gaya district case; counsel sought withdrawal after some arguments and permission was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12364 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2022 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya
======================================================
CHHOTU YADAV @ SUNIL YADAV S/O CHALITAR YADAV R/vBumer, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 18-03-2023 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail petition.
Permission is granted.
The anticipatory bail petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
asmit/-
U T
Chhotu Yadav @ Sunil Yadav
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
