Allowed

Kartik Kumar @ Kartik Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Jul 2023CR. MISC./12245/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge oral order granting bail to petitioner in PIL. The petitioner Balkan Sec. Conv. No. 12245 of 2023 was held to be guilty of the offence punishable under Sections 30(a)(b)(c)(d) of the Excise Act and bail was granted on furnishing of Rs. 10,000 bail bond and two sureties. The order directs the court below to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties subject to conditions. Court below to verify criminal antecedent.

Kartik Kumar @ Kartik Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12245 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-403 Year-2021 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KARTIK KUMAR @ KARTIK CHAUDHARY Son of Shiv Chaudhary R/vAamipur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh,APP

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 27-07-2023

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 07.01.2023 in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S. Case No. 403 of 2021, F.I.R. dated 06.04.2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a)(b)(c)(d) of the Excise Act.

¶17

Recovery is of 400 ml of country made liquor, 05 liters of spirit and packing machine.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to his previous criminal antecedent. Further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12245 of 2023(5) dt.27-07-2023 2/4

¶20

of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of the so called confessional statement of the co-accused person, namely, Arvind Yadav. Further submits that from bare perusal of the FIR as well as the seizure list that no incriminating article (illicit liquor) has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and thereafter the petitioner has confessed his guilt in the present occurrence and except the aforesaid, no other material has come during investigation against the petitioner to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. Further submits that the co-accused persons namely, Arbind Yadav, Kaushal Yadav and Lakshman Yadav @ Lakshman Kumar have been granted bail by different Coordinate Benches of this Hon’ble Court vide orders dated 30.05.2022, 23.08.2022 and 03.01.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 72533 of 2021,40559 and 56055 of 2022 respectively and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 07.01.2023.

¶21

Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits the petitioner carries twenty three more cases other than the present one and all are in similar nature.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12245 of 2023(5) dt.27-07-2023 3/4

¶23

Considering the aforesaid facts, nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge 1^st Nawada in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S. Case No. 403 of 2021,with the following conditions:-

¶24

(I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶25

(II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12245 of 2023(5) dt.27-07-2023 4/4

¶28

order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

¶29

verification.

¶30

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶31

Nitesh/-

¶32

U T

Kartik Kumar @ Kartik Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kartik Kumar @ Kartik Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Manan Miyan Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Sahni @ Sanjay Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Das @ Suman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Shankar Kumar @ Ravi Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Ray Vs The State of Bihar