Allowed

Amarjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Mar 2023CR. MISC./10326/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail sought in a murder case arising from an assault over a land dispute; no specific overt act attributed to the petitioners and five co-accused already granted bail. The court granted bail on bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court.

Amarjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10326 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2021 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Amarjeet Kumar Son of Siya Saran Yadav,

¶5

Siya Saran Yadav Son of Late Chandar Yadav Both Resident of Village- Panari, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 16-03-2023

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

¶17

Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 168 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

As per the prosecution, the informant alleged that both the petitioners with their accomplices arrived at the alleged place and thereafter abused and assaulted the informant and his family members over a land dispute and in the alleged assault the informant’s father died.

¶19

The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners are that in the FIR altogether 24 persons including the petitioners have been named as accused,

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10326 of 2023(2) dt.16-03-2023 2/2

¶21

against the petitioners who are father and son, there is no specific allegation and any specific overt act of the petitioners in the alleged occurrence has not been revealed and admittedly, land dispute was running in between both the parties when the alleged occurrence took place and the said land dispute is stated to be the genesis of the occurrence. Further submission is that out of the twenty-four named accused persons, five have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order passed in Cr. Misc. 51878 of 2021 and Cr. Misc. No. 61563 of 2021 and both the petitioners have fair and clean antecedent.

¶22

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer.

¶23

In view of the facts as stated above, in the opinion of this court, the petitioners deserve to a lenient approach of this court. Accordingly, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 168 of 2021.

¶24

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶25

Rajiv/-

¶26

U T

Amarjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amarjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Kebal Singh @ Babu Saheb Vs the State of Bihar

Meera Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Bambam Kumar Mehta @ Bambam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Hastam Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanushdhari Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Saw Vs the State of Bihar