Allowed

Vijay Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Sept 2023CR. MISC./10182/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted bail to a husband accused under Sections 498A and 304 IPC. The court observed the petitioner was at work in Kerala during the incident and inclined to enlarge him on furnishing a bond with sureties under the trial court's supervision.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned CJM.

Vijay Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10182 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-652 Year-2021 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIJAY PASWAN Son of Ajit Paswan Resident of village - Chakmida Berai, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, District - Vaishali, Bihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rupa Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pronoti Singh ======================================================

¶6

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶7

5 05-09-2023

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶9

APP for the State.

¶10

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 498A, 328, 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner is husband of the deceased and was residing at Kerala to earn his livlihood. He was in habit of instigating his family members to torture and assault his wife and ultimately she was being killed by the accused persons.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is husband of the deceased and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has never demanded any thing from the deceased. Prior to the alleged incident, there is no complain in respect of torture or harassment by any one at her

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10182 of 2023(5) dt.05-09-2023 2/2

¶14

matrimonial home. In fact, deceased was a lady of quarrelsome nature and over some dispute, she become aggravated and consumed poison about which information was provided to her parents. At the time and date of occurrence, petitioner was not present there rather he had gone to Kerala to earn his livelihood. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 9.12.2022.

¶15

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that during investigation, several witnesses have supported the prosecution story. As per FSL Report, thimet was detected which is highly poisonous .

¶16

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Vaishali in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 652 of 2021.

¶17

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶18

sushma/-

¶19

Vijay Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Bindeshwar Mandal @ Bindeshwar Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Chadeshwar Prasad @ Chandrashekhar Prasad @ Satish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Yadav @ Deva Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Teras Kumar @ Taresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Singh Vs The State of Bihar