Allowed

Dhananjay Kumar Singh @ Dr. Dhananjay Kumar @ Badho @ Badhu Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Dec 2023CR. APP (SJ)/570/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal u/s 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST Act against refusal of anticipatory bail, the Patna High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and directed the release of the appellant on bail within six weeks upon compliance of procedural guidelines.

What did the court decide?

The appellant was to be released on bail within six weeks by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Dhananjay Kumar Singh @ Dr. Dhananjay Kumar @ Badho @ Badhu… — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.570 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2022 Thana- SC/ST District- Gaya

¶3

====================================================== DHANANJAY KUMAR SINGH @ DR. DHANANJAY KUMAR @ BADHO @ BADHU SINGH Son of Braj Bhushan Singh Resident of VillageKochi, P.S.- Guraru, District- Gaya. ... ... Appellant/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar.

¶6

Ramsundra Paswan, son of Late Ramlagan Paswan, resident of village Kanchi, P.S. Guraru, District Gaya.

¶7

... ... Respondents.

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binay Krishna, Special P.P. For the Respondent No.2: Mr. Bindeshwari Singh, Advocate

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 20-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the respondent no.2.

¶11

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter in short referred to as the 'SC/ST Act') against the refusal of prayer of anticipatory bail vide order dated 28.06.2022 passed by learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Gaya in connection with Gaya SC/ST P.S. Case No. 13/2022 registered under Sections 341, 323, 304, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1) (r) (s) 3 (2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶12

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.570 of 2023(4) dt.20-12-2023 2/3

¶13

The allegation against the appellant is that he along with other co-accused is said to have slated the informant in the name of caste and also threatened him of dire consequences.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Appellant has been falsely implicated in the case. As a matter of fact, the daughterin-law of the informant was brought at the clinic of the appellant in worst condition and she was referred to ANMCH and lastly she died on way. Slating the informant in the name of caste is said to have been made at the house of the appellant and not in public view, hence no offence under SC/ST Act is made out against the appellant. It is further submitted that both the parties have compromised the matter. It is also submitted that the police has not complied the guide lines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Jacob Mathew Vs. State of Punjab and others since reported in (2005) 6 SCC 1 . The allegation levelled against the appellant is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Appellant has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this memo of appeal.

¶15

Learned Spl. PP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 accedes to the fact that compromise has entered into between the parties.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.570 of 2023(4) dt.20-12-2023 3/3

¶17

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named appellant, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Gaya in connection with Gaya SC/ST P.S. Case No.13 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal is allowed.

¶19

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶20

Trivedi/-

¶21

U T

Dhananjay Kumar Singh @ Dr. Dhananjay Kumar @ Badho @ Badhu Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay Kumar Singh @ Dr. Dhananjay Kumar @ Badho @ Badhu Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Monu Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Gupta @ Amit Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Ashique @ Md. Ashique Vs The State of Bihar

Rahmat Ali @ Md. Rahmat Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Manjur Alam Vs The State of Bihar