Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 5099 of 2019 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on multiple hearing dates despite repeated summons and notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5099 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2004 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul
======================================================
SATTAN PASWAN @ SATAN PASWAN Son of Late Bhatan Paswan Resident of Village- Daharia, P.S- Chhatapur, District- Supaul.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binod Bihari Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
4 20-06-2023 On repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the
appellant to press this appeal.
On 20.04.2023, also none turned up.
Accordingly, the present memo of appeal is dismissed
for want of prosecution.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
utkarsh/- U T
Satatan Paswan @ Satan Paswan
The State of Bihar
Shyam Ballabh Paswan
Bhoganand Paswan
Pahari Paswan
Ashok Paswan
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
