Allowed

Firoz @ Firoz Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Apr 2023CR. APP (SJ)/482/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an appeal against the rejection of bail in an SC/ST case. With frames of charges completed by the lower court, the court directed the release of the appellant on bail with a bond of Rs.25,000 and standard conditions regarding appearance and cooperation.

What did the court decide?

The appellant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to specific conditions of appearance and cooperation.

Firoz @ Firoz Ansari Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.482 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2021 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

FIROZ @ FIROZ ANSARI S/o Mojahir Ansari R/o Village- Barwa, Bishunpurwa, P.S.- Shikarpur, Distt- West Champaran.

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Bhukhali Devi W/o Sukhari Manjhi R/o Village- Barwa Bishunpurwa, P.S.Shikarpur, Distt- West Champaran.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Appellant/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P.

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 26-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

As per direction of this Court, learned Spl.P.P. for the State informed the respondent no.2 about her appearance in this case but despite of that, nobody appears on her behalf.

¶16

This is an appeal under section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter in short referred to as the ‘SC/ST Act’) against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 03.12.2022, passed by learned 1^st Additional District & Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge (SC/ST), Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No.214/2021, registered u/s 302/201/34 of the IPC and sections 3(2)(V), SC & ST (POA) Act.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.482 of 2023(4) dt.26-04-2023 2/3

¶18

Earlier, the prayer for bail of this appellant was rejected vide order dated 19.05.2022 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.4497/2021 by this Court with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

¶19

The appellant has now filed this appeal for bail and vide order dated 15.03.2023, a report was called for in this case.

¶20

In compliance thereof, a report is sent by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 1^st -cum- Special Judge (SC/ST), Bettiah, West Champaran, dated 25.03.2023, whereby it is stated that the charge has been framed on 01.02.2023. The appellant is in custody since 18.08.2021.

¶21

Considering that the charge has been framed, the appellant named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1^st Additional District & Sessions Judge -cumSpecial Judge (SC/ST), Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No.214/2021, subject to the following conditions:

¶22

(1) One of the bailors will be own close relative of the appellant who will give on affidavit genealogy as to how he is relative to appellant. The bailor will also undertake to inform the

¶23

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.482 of 2023(4) dt.26-04-2023 3/3

¶24

court if there is any change in the address of the appellant.

¶25

(2) The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will

¶26

inform the court concerned if the appellant is made accused in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse.

¶27

(3) The appellant shall remain physically present in the court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

¶28

(4) The appellant shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶29

(5) The appellant shall appear before the Police Station of his local area in the first week of each month till the disposal of the present case.

¶30

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal is allowed.

¶31

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

Firoz @ Firoz Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Firoz @ Firoz Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tetari Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ismahamad Miyan Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Mohammad Ali Hasan Vs The State of Bihar

Himanshu Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar