Ora l order in criminal appeal held infructuous and withdrawn. Appeal dismissed.
Petition/Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn/infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2364 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2022 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran
======================================================
RAHUL PRASAD @ RAHUL KUMAR S/O SITARAM PRASAD @ MISTRI Resident of Village- Makhdumganj, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Saran.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Manjeet Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the matter
has become infructuous during the pendency of the case and as such, the petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ajay Singh/-
U T
Rahul Prasad @ Rahul Kumar
The State of Bihar
Kundan Kumar Chaudhary
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
