The High Court allowed an appeal against the refusal of anticipatory bail under the SC/ST Act. The court set aside the impugned order and granted bail subject to conditions, noting a compromise between the parties.
Bail granted on bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2132 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2020 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
4 01-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2132 of 2023(4) dt.01-11-2023 2/3
Sessions Judge 3rd cum Special Judge SC/ST/MP/MLA, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 113 of 2020 registered under Sections 147, 149, 504, 325, 379, 354, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2132 of 2023(4) dt.01-11-2023 3/3
case, let the above named appellants, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 3rd cum Special Judge SC/ST/MP/MLA, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 113 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
anand/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail order refusing bail should be set aside in view of the compromise between the parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rameshwar Chaubey
Kanhaiya Chaubey
The State of Bihar
Kusum Kunwar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
