the plaintiffs is that the premises is an ancestral property of the plaintiffs and in the family of the plaintiffs, partition took place and a suit for partition bearing Partition Suit no. 147 of 1956 was filed in the Court of Sub-Judge, Darbhanga, which was later on compromised and the land over which the suit premises was allotted in the share and Patti of mother of the plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 and grandmother of the plaintiff No. 3 and after the death of the mother of the plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2, they came over the possession of the suit premises being heirs and legal representatives of the deceased-mother and the plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 and the grandfather of the plaintiff No. 3 let out the suit premises to defendant Nos. 1 and 5 on the monthly rental of Rs. 100/- (One Hundred) each per month and both the premises let out to the defendant Nos. 1 and 5 and they came in possession over the suit premises as tenant and paid the rent of the premises to the plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 as month to month tenant and got rent receipts and later on defendant No. 5, namely, Talha Ansari left his business because he was unable to do the same due to old age and the entire premise came under the possession of defendant Nos. 1 to 4 and they paid the rent of the premises till February, 2004. Thereafter, the defendants stopped the payment of rent from March, 2004 to July, 2005 and the rent of Rs.
