The Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed as infructuous by the Patna High Court. Counsel for the appellants submitted that the appeal had become infructuous and sought dismissal, which the court granted.
The appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.728 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10897 of 2016
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Anirudh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Labh, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
14 22-06-2023
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the
appeal has become infructuous and prays for dismissal of the same.
Patna High Court L.P.A No.728 of 2017(14) dt.22-06-2023 2/2
The appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
Anushka/-
U
State Of Bihar through the Secretary Building Construction Department
The Chief Engineer North Building Construction Department
The Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Department
The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department
Pramod Jha
The Account General A and E Bihar
K. Vinod Chandran
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
