The Patna High Court dismissed a miscellaneous application for non-prosecution as no representation appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.317 of 2019
In
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.71 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 5 11-05-2022 On 20-04-2022, there was no representation on behalf of
Patna High Court MJC No.317 of 2019(5) dt.11-05-2022 2/2
Today, the position is same. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners nor any prayer has been made for any accommodation.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shyambihari/-
U
Baiju Mahto
Rabindra Prasad
The State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
