The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the miscellaneous jurisdiction petitions. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petitions was granted, leading to their dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3829 of 2013
In
Miscellaneous Appeal No.33 of 2006
======================================================
Bibi Sajrun Nisa
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Md. Amir Hanza and Ors.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== with
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1392 of 2014 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1288 of 2010
====================================================== Bibi Sajrun Nisa
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
Md. Aamir Hamza and Ors.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3829 of 2013) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramadhar Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Diwakar Sinha (In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1392 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramadhar Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Diwakar Sinha
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
ORAL ORDER
11 26-04-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the above MJC petitions.
Accordingly, the present MJC petitions stands
dismissed as withdrawn.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
rakhi/-
U
Bibi Sajrun Nisa
Md. Amir Hanza and Ors.
P. B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
