Petitioners challenged service matters. The High Court observed that defects were removed and grievances redressed, rendering the application infructuous, and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1125 of 2020
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21522 of 2019
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 28-09-2022
Though the defects have been removed but the
Patna High Court MJC No.1125 of 2020(4) dt.28-09-2022 2/2
petitioner does not press this application, as his grievance has already been redressed and the order
passed by this Court has been complied with.
The petition stands disposed of as having
become infructuous.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
krishna/-
U
Durgesh Chandra Trinetram
Alok Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
R.K. Mahajan
Rahul Singh
Ranjeet Singh
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
